Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1437553

Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: use ipte range to invalidate multiple page table entries

From Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: use ipte range to invalidate multiple page table entries
Date 2016-07-06 10:50 +0200
Message-ID <rRQGS-6SL-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rRMjT-4hL-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rRMjT-4hL-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rROvo-5Cf-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <rROOJ-5IG-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 06 Jul 2016 14:42:16 +0800
"Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> wrote:

> > > >
> > > > +void ptep_invalidate_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> > > > +			   unsigned long end, pte_t *ptep)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	unsigned long nr;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (!MACHINE_HAS_IPTE_RANGE || mm_has_pgste(mm))
> > > > +		return;
> > > > +	preempt_disable();
> > > > +	nr = (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > > > +	/* If the flush is likely to be local skip the ipte range */
> > > > +	if (nr && !cpumask_equal(mm_cpumask(mm),
> > > > +				 cpumask_of(smp_processor_id())))
> > >
> > > s/smp/raw_smp/ to avoid adding schedule entry with page table
> > > lock held?
> > 
> > There can not be a schedule entry with either the page table lock held
> > or the preempt_disable() a few lines above.
> > 
> Yes, Sir.
> 
> > > > +		__ptep_ipte_range(start, nr - 1, ptep);
> > > > +	preempt_enable();
> 
> Then would you please, Sir, take a look at another case where
> preempt is enabled?

You are still a bit cryptic, are you trying to tell me that your hint is
about trying to avoid the preempt_enable() call? 

The reason why I added the preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pair to
ptep_invalidate_range is that I recently got bitten by a preempt problem
in the ptep_xchg_lazy() function which is used for ptep_get_and_clear().
Now ptep_get_and_clear() is used in vunmap_pte_range() which is called
while preemption is allowed.

To keep things symmetrical it seems sensible to explicitely disable
preemption on all ptep_xxx code paths with cpu mask checks, no?

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: use ipte range to invalidate multiple page table entries "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-07-06 06:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: use ipte range to invalidate multiple page  table entries Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2016-07-06 08:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: use ipte range to invalidate multiple page table entries "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-07-06 08:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: use ipte range to invalidate multiple page  table entries Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2016-07-06 10:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: use ipte range to invalidate multiple page table entries "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-07-06 11:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 2/2] s390/mm: use ipte range to invalidate multiple page  table entries Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2016-07-06 13:00 +0200

csiph-web