Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1436107

Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags

From Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags
Date 2016-07-04 03:50 +0200
Message-ID <rR1bj-7L2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <rNqKZ-3iw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rP8gV-3r9-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rP8Ah-3MT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rPi6C-1fN-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <rQgYO-4Wp-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2016년 07월 02일 09:20, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 06/29, Jongsung Kim wrote:
>> On 2016년 06월 29일 06:18, Michael Turquette wrote:
>>> Quoting Rob Herring (2016-06-28 13:55:18)
>>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 01:12:52PM +0900, Jongsung Kim wrote:
>>>>> There is no way to set additional flags for a DT-initialized fixed-
>>>>> factor-clock, and it can be problematic i.e., when the clock rate
>>>>> needs to be changed. [1][2]
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch introduces an optional dt-binding named "clock-flags" to
>>>>> be used for passing any needed flags from dts.
>>>> I don't think we want this in DT. If we did, the flags would need some 
>>>> documentation about what the flags mean.
>>> Flags are specific to Linux implementation, so I agree with Rob. Better
>>> to create a compatible string for your hardware that bakes in the flags.
>> Thank you for your comment, Mike. This conversation starts from lacking method to set CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT from DT. I understand compatible string can be a solution. But.. if someone starts talking about lacking method to set another flag, i.e., CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE, then we'll need another compatible string list.
>> How do you think about defining possible required subset of the flags and using some more neutral flag-names acceptable in DT?
> Do you actually have an IC on the board that is doing some fixed
> factor calculation? Or is this a clk driver design where we are
> listing out each piece of an SoC's clk controller in DT?
>
The SoC has several PLLs of identical design, and one of them is divided
to half and used for CPUs. The fixed-factor-clock represents the divider.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com> - 2016-06-24 06:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-06-28 23:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> - 2016-06-28 23:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com> - 2016-06-29 09:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-07-02 02:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com> - 2016-07-04 03:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] clk: fixed-factor: add optional dt-binding clock-flags Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@lge.com> - 2016-06-29 07:10 +0200

csiph-web