Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1433181
| From | Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/23] [AARCH64] define word size for lp64 and ilp32 |
| Date | 2016-06-28 19:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rP5j3-1EC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rP4wG-18P-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <rP4Gm-1rl-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <rP4Gm-1rl-51@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jun 2016, Yury Norov wrote: > > > diff --git a/sysdeps/aarch64/bits/wordsize.h b/sysdeps/aarch64/bits/wordsize.h > > See what I said in > <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-06/msg00786.html> about "make > other bits/wordsize.h files define the macro to 0". This patch would > break all other architectures (and AArch64 LP64 - you should test build > and testsuite for that, as well as ILP32, and confirm that there are no > testsuite regressions for LP64). (Actually, for LP64, if you can confirm that the installed stripped shared libraries are byte-for-byte identical before and after the patch series, then a testsuite run is unnecessary. But you still need to run the testsuite for ILP32, and justify any failures there, and if the LP64 binaries aren't byte-for-byte identical, you should justify why they aren't.) -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 01/23] [AARCH64] define word size for lp64 and ilp32 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> - 2016-06-28 19:10 +0200 Re: [PATCH 01/23] [AARCH64] define word size for lp64 and ilp32 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> - 2016-06-28 19:50 +0200
csiph-web