Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1433003
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest? |
| Date | 2016-06-28 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rP1It-7PJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rOUQG-3cY-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOUQG-3cY-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:33:18 +0900 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote: > Send again to correct addresses, sorry! > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm running some guest machines for kernel development. For debugging > > purpose, I use lots of trace_printk() since it's faster than normal > > printk(). When kernel crash happens the trace buffer is printed on > > console (I set ftrace_dump_on_oops) but it takes too much time. I > > don't want to reduce the size of ring buffer as I want to collect the > > debug info as much as possible. And I also want to see trace from all > > cpu so 'ftrace_dump_on_oop = 2' is not an option. > > > > I know the kexec/kdump (and the crash tool) can dump and analyze the > > trace buffer later. But it's cumbersome to do it everytime and more > > importantly, I don't want to spend the memory for the crashkernel. > > > > So what is the best way to handle this? I'd like to know how others > > setup the debugging environment.. Heh, I'd say something helpful but you basically already shot down all of my advice, because what I do is... 1) Reduce the size of the ring buffer 2) Dump out just one CPU 3) use kexec/kdump and make a crash kernel to extract trace.dat from That's my debugging environment, but it looks like you want something else. -- Steve
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest? Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2016-06-28 08:40 +0200
Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest? Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-06-28 16:00 +0200
Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest? Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2016-06-29 03:00 +0200
Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest? Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2016-07-01 06:30 +0200
Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest? Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in> - 2016-06-28 18:50 +0200
Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest? Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2016-06-29 03:00 +0200
Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest? Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-06-29 03:30 +0200
Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest? Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2016-07-01 06:10 +0200
Re: [QUESTION] Is there a better way to get ftrace dump on guest? Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2016-06-29 03:50 +0200
csiph-web