Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently

From	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently
Date	2016-06-27 04:00 +0200
Message-ID	<rOu09-28m-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<rHmqJ-1so-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHmqJ-1so-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rN0GS-2fs-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOfDS-1FB-155@gated-at.bofh.it> <rOsB3-1om-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:

> So IMO all of the callers should be made clamp the target frequency
> between min and max and those checks should be dropped from the
> low-level helpers.

Okay, so doing this from all these very low level helpers can be avoided
by moving them to cpufreq_frequency_table_target() at least for now.

Later on we can see on how we can update the callers and see how
it works best.

Thanks for the review.

--
viresh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more  efficiently Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-26 12:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 02:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] cpufreq: Handle sorted frequency tables more efficiently Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-27 04:00 +0200

csiph-web