Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1430773

Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] x86/ioapic: Support hot-removal of IOAPICs present during boot

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 1:35 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 01:11:41PM +0800, Rui Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, June 22, 2016 11:15 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > @@ -1779,8 +1780,12 @@ void __init
> > > > pci_assign_unassigned_resources(void)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct pci_bus *root_bus;
> > > >
> > > > -	list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node)
> > > > +	list_for_each_entry(root_bus, &pci_root_buses, node) {
> > > >  		pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(root_bus);
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > > > +		acpi_ioapic_add(ACPI_HANDLE(root_bus->bridge));
> > > > +#endif
> > >
> > > Doesn't this do the right thing even if you omit the #ifdefs, since
> > > you define a stub function below?
> > >
> >
> > No. Without the '#ifdef CONFIG_X86' it breaks MIPS arch. The stub
> > function is within 'ifdef CONFIG_ACPI'. On archs without ACPI it
> > doesn't compile due to 'undefined reference to acpi_ioapic_add'.
> 
> But this *could* be made to work by defining a stub for the non-
> CONFIG_ACPI case.  That's what we generally do to avoid ifdefs in the code.

That can be done. I'll make the change and do some cross-compiling tests first.

Thanks
Rui

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] x86/ioapic: Support hot-removal of IOAPICs  present during boot Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2016-06-23 19:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] x86/ioapic: Support hot-removal of IOAPICs present during boot Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> - 2016-06-24 17:50 +0200
  [PATCH V5 1/3] x86/ioapic: Support hot-removal of IOAPICs present during boot Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com> - 2016-06-26 06:10 +0200

csiph-web