Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1429534

Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons.

From Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons.
Date 2016-06-23 09:40 +0200
Message-ID <rN7oZ-6Je-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <rMslR-5hj-51@gated-at.bofh.it> <rN53P-5jQ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rN53P-5jQ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rN53P-5jQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rN7oZ-6Je-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
> Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> So if you want aarch64 to be compatible with aarch32, you need to
>> define __WORDSIZE_TIME64_COMPAT32.  If we don't want aarch64 and
>> aarch32 to be compatible at all, then we can drop this patch or if you
>> don't want LP64 and ILP32 to be compatible either.
>
> Or go the other way like s390 and use the LP64 layout for ILP32.

That will solve the ILP32 side of things and I am ok with doing that
but not it does not solve that right now AARCH32 and AARCH64 are
incompatible.
You could say AARCH64 LP64 is currently broken because of this
incompatible but nobody has complained until now.

So the question becomes do we care enough about the incompatibles
between AARCH32 and AARCH64 to fix this and go just worry about ILP32
and LP64?

Thanks,
Andrew

>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
> GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
> "And now for something completely different."

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 07:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> - 2016-06-23 09:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 09:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 09:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> - 2016-06-23 10:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility  reasons. Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> - 2016-06-24 13:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility reasons. Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> - 2016-06-26 01:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 01/27] [AARCH64] Fix utmp struct for compatibility  reasons. Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> - 2016-06-24 13:40 +0200

csiph-web