Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1428110
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE |
| Date | 2016-06-21 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rMzQl-1Gf-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <rKLiV-3Wz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMuH0-6Vn-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMvWq-7DO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMzQl-1Gf-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rMzQl-1Gf-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:43:56PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:37:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Hurm.. So I've applied it, just to get this issue sorted, but I'm not > > entirely sure I like it. > > > > I think I prefer ego's version because that makes it harder to get stuff > > to run on !active,online cpus. I think we really want to be careful what > > gets to run during that state. > > The original patch just did set_cpus_allowed one more time late enough > so that the target kthread (in most cases) doesn't have to go through > fallback rq selection afterwards. I don't know what the long term > solution is but CPU_ONLINE callbacks should be able to bind kthreads > to the new CPU one way or the other. Fair enough; clearly I need to stare harder. In any case, patch is on its way to sched/urgent.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-15 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-21 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-22 07:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 22:50 +0200
csiph-web