Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1424358

Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE

From Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE
Date 2016-06-16 21:40 +0200
Message-ID <rKLiV-3Wz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rHqXo-4lt-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHqXo-4lt-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKlou-4sY-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKoFI-6BZ-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hello,

So, the issue of the initial worker not having its affinity set
correctly wasn't caused by the order of the operations.  Reordering
just made set_cpus_allowed tried one more time late enough so that it
hides the race condition most of the time.  The problem is that
CPU_ONLINE callbacks are called while the cpu being onlined is online
but not active and select_fallback_rq() only considers active cpus, so
if a kthread gets scheduled in the meantime and it doesn't have any
cpu which is active in its allowed mask, it's allowed mask gets reset
to cpu_possible_mask.

Would something like the following make sense?

Thanks.
------ 8< ------
Subject: [PATCH] sched: allow kthreads to fallback to online && !active cpus

During CPU hotplug, CPU_ONLINE callbacks are run while the CPU is
online but not active.  A CPU_ONLINE callback may create or bind a
kthread so that its cpus_allowed mask only allows the CPU which is
being brought online.  The kthread may start executing before the CPU
is made active and can end up in select_fallback_rq().

In such cases, the expected behavior is selecting the CPU which is
coming online; however, because select_fallback_rq() only chooses from
active CPUs, it determines that the task doesn't have any viable CPU
in its allowed mask and ends up overriding it to cpu_possible_mask.

CPU_ONLINE callbacks should be able to put kthreads on the CPU which
is coming online.  Update select_fallback_rq() so that it follows
cpu_online() rather than cpu_active() for kthreads.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 017d539..a12e3db 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1536,7 +1536,9 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
 	for (;;) {
 		/* Any allowed, online CPU? */
 		for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)) {
-			if (!cpu_active(dest_cpu))
+			if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) && !cpu_active(dest_cpu))
+				continue;
+			if (!cpu_online(dest_cpu))
 				continue;
 			goto out;
 		}

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the  beginning of CPU_ONLINE Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 18:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the  beginning of CPU_ONLINE Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-15 21:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the  beginning of CPU_ONLINE Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 21:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the  beginning of CPU_ONLINE Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-21 16:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the  beginning of CPU_ONLINE Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 17:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the  beginning of CPU_ONLINE Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 21:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the  beginning of CPU_ONLINE Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 21:50 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the  beginning of CPU_ONLINE Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-22 07:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the  beginning of CPU_ONLINE Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-21 22:50 +0200

csiph-web