Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1427173
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to zram |
| Date | 2016-06-21 03:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rMimt-7ky-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rLZMR-42g-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rLZMR-42g-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rM9sS-1zy-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:36:19AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Hello, > > just for information Thank you for informing it. > > there was a proposal from -rt people to use normal spinlocks > for table's entries, rather that bitspinlock. I had a patch > some time ago, will obtain some performance data and post > RFC [may be tomorrow]. > > -ss >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 3/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to zram Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to zram Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/5] lockdep: Apply bit_spin_lock lockdep to zram Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-06-21 03:10 +0200
csiph-web