Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1426845

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline options

From Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline options
Date 2016-06-20 19:30 +0200
Message-ID <rMbbk-2Hq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rKAxc-5MU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKAxc-5MU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKIEp-2jH-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rLYe5-2UC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rM8wO-ZK-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:38:18AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:29:13AM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> > On 2016/6/17 0:48, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >Em Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 08:02:41AM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
> > >>With '--dry-run', 'perf record' doesn't do reall recording. Combine with
> > >>llvm.dump-obj option, --dry-run can be used to help compile BPF objects for
> > >>embedded platform.
> > >So these are nice and have value, but can we have a subcommand to do all
> > >this with an expressive name, Something like:
> 
> > >   perf bpfcc foo.c -o foo
> 
> > >or shorter:
> 
> > >   perf bcc foo.c -o foo
> 
> > >Just like one would use gcc or some other compiler to generate something
> > >for later use?
> 
> > I'll try it today. I thought a subcommand require a bigger feature,
> > and wrapping clang is not big enough.
> 
> Not really, we may have as many as we like, given that they provide
> something useful, like I think is the case here.
> 
> Having to edit ~/.perfconfig, create a new section, a variable in it
> with a boolean value (at first, just reading the changeset comment, I
> thought I had to provide a directory where to store the objects
> "dumped"), to then use a tool to record a .c event, but not recording
> (use dry-run, which is useful to test the command line, etc), to then
> get, on the current directory, the end result looked to me a convoluted
> way to ask perf to compile the given .c file into a .o for later use.
> 
> Doing:
> 
> 	perf bcc -c foo.c
> 
> Looks so much simpler and similar to an existing compile source code
> into object file workflow (gcc's, any C compiler) that I think it would
> fit in the workflow being discussed really nicely.

I'm hopeful that eventually we'll be able merge iovisor/bcc project
with perf, so would be good to reserve 'perf bcc' command for that
future use. Also picking a different name for compiling would be less
confusing to users who already familiar with bcc. Instead we can use:
perf bpfcc foo.c -o foo.o
perf cc foo.c
perf compile foo.c

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline options Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2016-06-16 10:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-16 18:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-16 19:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2016-06-20 05:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2016-06-20 16:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 19:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 20:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-20 21:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-20 20:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline options Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 04:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 04:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2016-06-21 08:30 +0200
            perf cc/perf bpf was: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run  option to check cmdline options Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-21 19:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2016-06-21 04:00 +0200
  [tip:perf/core] perf record: Add --dry-run option to check cmdline  options tip-bot for Wang Nan <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-06-22 10:40 +0200

csiph-web