Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1426874

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support using genpd

From Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support using genpd
Date 2016-06-20 20:00 +0200
Message-ID <rMbEl-2RX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rKCSm-7c3-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKCSm-7c3-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKJAt-2T5-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKJKa-2Wq-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKXap-43m-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization BayLibre

Show all headers | View raw


"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org> writes:

> On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 18:59 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> 
>> On 16/06/16 18:47, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 11:38 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> +enum scpi_power_domain_state {
>> >> +	SCPI_PD_STATE_ON = 0,
>> >> +	SCPI_PD_STATE_OFF = 3,
>> >> +};
>> >
>> > The SCPI doc defines the meaning of these numbers (0 and 3) in the 'Juno
>> > specifics' chapter. So does these values need to come from device-tree
>> > to allow for other hardware or SCP implementations?
>> >
>> 
>> Ah unfortunately true :(. I had not noticed that. But I would like to
>> check if this can be made as part of the standard protocol. Adding such
>> details to DT seems overkill and defeat of the whole purpose of the
>> standard protocol.
>
> Well. it seems to me the 'standard protocol' is whatever the current
> implementation of ARM's closed source SCP firmware is. It also seems to
> me that people are making things up as they go along, without a clue as
> to how to make things generic, robust and future proof. Basically,
> Status Normal ARM Fucked Up.

Fully agree here.  Just because ARM calls it a "standard" does not make
it so.  As we've already seen[1], vendors are using initial/older/whatever
versions of SCPI, so pushing the Juno version as standard just becuase
it's in ARM's closed firmware is not the right way forward either.

Kevin

[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=146425562931515&w=2

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-16 12:40 +0200
  [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support using genpd Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-16 12:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support  using genpd "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org> - 2016-06-16 19:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support  using genpd Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-16 20:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support  using genpd "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org> - 2016-06-17 10:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support  using genpd Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-17 10:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support using genpd Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-06-20 20:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support  using genpd Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-20 20:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support  using genpd Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-17 11:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support  using genpd Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-17 11:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support  using genpd Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-20 21:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support using genpd Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-06-21 00:00 +0200
  [PATCH v2 2/3] Documentation: add DT bindings for ARM SCPI power domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-16 12:40 +0200
  [PATCH v2 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: add support for device power state management Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-16 12:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: add support for device power  state management "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org> - 2016-06-16 20:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] firmware: arm_scpi: add support for device power  state management Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-17 10:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org> - 2016-06-16 15:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-16 15:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2016-06-17 11:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2016-06-17 17:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-17 17:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-06-20 20:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] firmware: scpi: add device power domain support Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-20 20:10 +0200

csiph-web