Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1426420
| From | Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer |
| Date | 2016-06-20 11:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rM3Qu-6sw-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rIQ3n-2Yh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rIQ3n-2Yh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rL8Sd-2Y1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rL9lf-3mT-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > +config INTEL_ISH_HID_TRANSPORT > > > + bool > > > + default n > > > + > > > +config INTEL_ISH_HID > > > + bool "Intel Integrated Sensor Hub" > > > > Why can't the transport driver be built as a module? > In current use case for PM, we don't want anyone to unload and > complain. Sorry, I don't understand this explanation, could you please elaborate? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-06-17 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-06-17 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-06-20 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-06-20 16:30 +0200
csiph-web