Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1426420

Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer

From Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer
Date 2016-06-20 11:40 +0200
Message-ID <rM3Qu-6sw-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rIQ3n-2Yh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rIQ3n-2Yh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rL8Sd-2Y1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rL9lf-3mT-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:

> > > +config INTEL_ISH_HID_TRANSPORT
> > > +     bool
> > > +     default n
> > > +
> > > +config INTEL_ISH_HID
> > > +     bool "Intel Integrated Sensor Hub"
> > 
> > Why can't the transport driver be built as a module?
> In current use case for PM, we don't want anyone to unload and
> complain.

Sorry, I don't understand this explanation, could you please elaborate?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-06-17 22:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-06-17 23:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-06-20 11:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/6] hid: intel_ish-hid: ISH Transport layer One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-06-20 16:30 +0200

csiph-web