Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1424565
| From | Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context |
| Date | 2016-06-17 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rKPZf-7Fj-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rKMym-4B7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKNkK-5aq-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 16-06-16 05:43 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Alexey Khoroshilov > <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> wrote: >> tcf_ife_init() contains a big chunk of code executed with >> ife->tcf_lock spinlock held. But that code contains several calls >> to sleeping functions: >> populate_metalist() and use_all_metadata() >> -> add_metainfo() >> -> find_ife_oplist(metaid) >> -> read_lock() >> -> try_module_get(o->owner) >> -> kzalloc(sizeof(*mi), GFP_KERNEL); > > Hmm, we don't need to hold that spinlock when we create a new ife action, > since we haven't inserted it yet. We do need it when we modify an existing > one. So I am thinking if we can refactor that code to avoid spinlock > whenever possible. > Does attached (compile tested) patch help? >> -> ops->alloc(mi, metaval); >> -> module_put(ops->owner); >> _tcf_ife_cleanup() >> -> module_put() >> >> The same problem is actual for tcf_ife_cleanup() as well. >> > > Huh? Both module_put() and kfree() should not sleep, right? > I dont think there is any sleeping there ;-> cheers, jamal
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> - 2016-06-16 23:00 +0200
Re: [BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 23:50 +0200
Re: [BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> - 2016-06-17 02:40 +0200
Re: [BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 04:20 +0200
Re: [BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 07:40 +0200
Re: [BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> - 2016-06-17 13:10 +0200
Re: [BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 19:20 +0200
Re: [BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> - 2016-06-17 13:10 +0200
Re: [BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2016-06-17 19:40 +0200
Re: [BUG] act_ife: sleeping functions called in atomic context Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> - 2016-06-18 16:50 +0200
csiph-web