Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1423771

Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?"

From Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?"
Date 2016-06-16 10:10 +0200
Message-ID <rKAxc-5MU-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rJA6d-6PL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJBlE-7AX-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKray-8lC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKA49-5o9-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 16/06/2016 09:30, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 12:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13/06/2016 16:44, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>>>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>>>  arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig     |  1 -
>>>>>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c       | 11 +++--------
>>>>>  include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------
>>>>>  virt/kvm/Kconfig         |  3 ---
>>>>>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>>  6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>> Looks like a sane approach, only two inversions in the s390 patch :)
>>
>> So it's okay to push patch 3 to kvm/next?
> 
> 
> With the 2 fixes that Conny requested, yes.
> 
> With that fixed up, 
> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

Yes, of course.  Pushed, thanks!

Paolo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-13 15:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-13 15:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-13 16:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-16 00:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-16 09:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-16 10:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-16 10:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-16 10:10 +0200

csiph-web