Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1423771
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" |
| Date | 2016-06-16 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rKAxc-5MU-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rJA6d-6PL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJBlE-7AX-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKray-8lC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKA49-5o9-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 16/06/2016 09:30, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 06/16/2016 12:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 13/06/2016 16:44, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>>>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++----- >>>>> arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 1 - >>>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 +++-------- >>>>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------ >>>>> virt/kvm/Kconfig | 3 --- >>>>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- >>>>> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) >>>>> >>> Looks like a sane approach, only two inversions in the s390 patch :) >> >> So it's okay to push patch 3 to kvm/next? > > > With the 2 fixes that Conny requested, yes. > > With that fixed up, > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Yes, of course. Pushed, thanks! Paolo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-13 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-13 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-13 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-16 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-16 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-16 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-16 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-16 10:10 +0200
csiph-web