Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1423751

Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?"

From Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?"
Date 2016-06-16 09:40 +0200
Message-ID <rKA49-5o9-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rJA6d-6PL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rJBlE-7AX-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <rKray-8lC-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/16/2016 12:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 13/06/2016 16:44, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>>  arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig     |  1 -
>>>>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c       | 11 +++--------
>>>>  include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------
>>>>  virt/kvm/Kconfig         |  3 ---
>>>>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c      | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>  6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>>>
>> Looks like a sane approach, only two inversions in the s390 patch :)
> 
> So it's okay to push patch 3 to kvm/next?


With the 2 fixes that Conny requested, yes.

With that fixed up, 
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-13 15:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-13 15:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-13 16:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-16 00:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-16 09:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-06-16 10:00 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-16 10:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one  VCPU been created?" Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-16 10:10 +0200

csiph-web