Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1419002

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work()

Show all headers | View raw

On 09-06-16, 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 09-06-16, 01:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >>
> >> There's no reason for gov_cancel_work() to exist at all, as it only
> >> has one caller and the only thing done by that caller is to invoke
> >> gov_cancel_work().
> >>
> >> Accordingly, drop gov_cancel_work() and move its contents to the
> >> caller.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |   19 +++++++------------
> >>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > I am wondering what happened to your other patches around the governor callbacks
> > and why weren't they applied yet :)
> 
> They are in linux-next now, aren't they?

Yeah, they are in now.

-- 
viresh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-06-09 01:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-09 05:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-06-09 14:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-10 05:00 +0200

csiph-web