Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1418044
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() |
| Date | 2016-06-09 05:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHYPn-Ey-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rHVou-6Nf-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 09-06-16, 01:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > There's no reason for gov_cancel_work() to exist at all, as it only > has one caller and the only thing done by that caller is to invoke > gov_cancel_work(). > > Accordingly, drop gov_cancel_work() and move its contents to the > caller. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 19 +++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> I am wondering what happened to your other patches around the governor callbacks and why weren't they applied yet :) -- viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-06-09 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-09 05:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-06-09 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Drop gov_cancel_work() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-10 05:00 +0200
csiph-web