Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1419710

Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fail on mismatching probe

From Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fail on mismatching probe
Date 2016-06-10 22:40 +0200
Message-ID <rIBnH-1m9-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <rHWkx-7lM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHWky-7lM-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHXTk-8w3-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:44:56PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> Now that we have access at probe time to the chip info described in the
>> device tree, check if the probed device matches the device node,
>> otherwise warn the user and fail.
>
> What good is this? So what if the device tree says a different
> model. We don't care, we don't use that information at all, we read it
> from the device itself.

So we can end up with a badly described device tree. It seems to be a
question of rigor vs. flexibility. I don't know much about the DT
philosophy and I don't really mind as long as we warn the user.

I'd like to have other opinions on this though before pushing v2.

Thanks,

        Vivien

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH net-next 0/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: misc probe improvements Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-09 02:50 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add chip detection helper Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-09 02:50 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: do not increment bus refcount Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-09 02:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: do not increment bus  refcount Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-06-09 04:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: do not increment bus refcount Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-10 22:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: do not increment bus  refcount Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-06-10 22:10 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: remove redundant assignments Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-09 02:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: remove redundant  assignments Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-06-09 04:40 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 5/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add switch register helpers Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-09 02:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add switch register  helpers Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-06-09 04:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add switch register helpers Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-09 15:00 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 3/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use already declared variables Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-09 02:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 3/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use already declared  variables Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-06-09 04:40 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 8/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fail on mismatching probe Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-09 02:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fail on mismatching  probe Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-06-09 04:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fail on mismatching probe Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-10 22:40 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 7/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: explicit compatible devices Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-09 02:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 7/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: explicit compatible  devices Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-06-09 04:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH net-next 7/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: explicit compatible devices Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-10 22:30 +0200
  [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix style issues Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> - 2016-06-09 02:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix style issues Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2016-06-09 04:30 +0200

csiph-web