Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1415916
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/7] reset: Consumers to explicitly request 'exclusive' or 'shared' lines |
| Date | 2016-06-07 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHluG-Te-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rH56x-6VJ-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHkRY-qE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHll0-PT-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Peter Griffin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > Phasing out generic reset line requests enables us to make some better > > > decisions on when and how to (de)assert said lines. If an 'exclusive' > > > line is requested, we know a device *requires* a reset and that it's > > > preferable to act upon a request right away. However, if a 'shared' > > > reset line is requested, we can reasonably assume sure that placing a > > > device into reset isn't a hard requirement, but probably a measure to > > > save power and is thus able to cope with not being asserted if another > > > device is still in use. > > > > > > In order allow gentle adoption and not to forcing all consumers to > > > move to the API immediately, causing administration headache between > > > subsystems, this patch adds some temporary stand-in shim-calls. This > > > will ease the burden at merge time and allow subsystems to migrate over > > > to the new API in a more realistic time-frame. > > > > Is the intention that this series will be taken into the next -rc? > > > > As the introduction of shared resets in reset subsystem has caused regressions > > on STi platforms. > > Yes, which is why it has a Fixes: tag. Ah wait. I thought this was the shared-memory patch. More haste, less speed and all that. I guess it should really go into the -rcs, yes. Since Hans' patch actually breaks a lot of devices. I'm pretty surprised a patch capable of this much damage was actually accepted to be honest. A better approach would have been to issue a warning, but keep the semantics the same for at least a couple of releases. However, I guess the damage has been done now, so let's do what we can do fix it. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/7] reset: Consumers to explicitly request 'exclusive' or 'shared' lines Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 6/7] phy: miphy28lp: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 18:00 +0200
Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 6/7] phy: miphy28lp: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org> - 2016-06-07 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 6/7] phy: miphy28lp: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-06-07 11:10 +0200
[PATCH 2/7] reset: Ensure drivers are explicit when requesting reset lines Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 7/7] usb: dwc3: st: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 9/10] usb: host: ehci-st: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 9/10] usb: host: ehci-st: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-06-06 19:50 +0200
[PATCH 8/10] phy: phy-stih407-usb: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 19:20 +0200
[PATCH 10/10] usb: host: ohci-st: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 19:20 +0200
Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 8/10] phy: phy-stih407-usb: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org> - 2016-06-07 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 8/10] phy: phy-stih407-usb: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-06-07 11:10 +0200
Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 7/7] usb: dwc3: st: Inform the reset framework that our reset line may be shared Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org> - 2016-06-07 10:50 +0200
[PATCH 5/7] reset: TRIVIAL: Add line break at same place for similar APIs Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 18:00 +0200
[PATCH 1/7] reset: Reorder inline reset_control_get*() wrappers Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 18:10 +0200
[PATCH 3/7] reset: Supply *_shared variant calls when using of_* API Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 18:10 +0200
[PATCH 4/7] reset: Supply *_shared variant calls when using *_optional APIs Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-06 18:10 +0200
Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/7] reset: Consumers to explicitly request 'exclusive' or 'shared' lines Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org> - 2016-06-07 10:50 +0200
Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/7] reset: Consumers to explicitly request 'exclusive' or 'shared' lines Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-07 11:20 +0200
Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/7] reset: Consumers to explicitly request 'exclusive' or 'shared' lines Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-07 11:30 +0200
csiph-web