linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree

From	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
Date	2016-06-09 06:40 +0200
Message-ID	<rHZV8-1pg-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c

between commit:

  9b1d0794b70d ("powercap / RAPL: add support for Skylake-X")

from the pm tree and commit:

  62d167330679 ("x86, powercap, rapl: Use Intel model macros intead of open-coding")
  0bb04b5f2c24 ("x86, powercap, rapl: Reorder CPU detection table")
  d40671e30cb4 ("x86, powercap, rapl: Add Skylake Server model number")

from the tip tree.

I fixed it up (I think that last tip tree commit does the same as the
pm tree one, so I used that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-06-09 06:40 +0200

csiph-web