Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1416982
| From | Hekuang <hekuang@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind |
| Date | 2016-06-08 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHGfL-5Ap-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rFO7L-6nc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFRoZ-69-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rHvaG-6PS-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
hi 在 2016/6/8 3:44, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 写道: > Em Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 09:06:29AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu: >> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:33:09AM +0000, He Kuang wrote: >> >> SNIP >> >>> For using remote libunwind libraries, reference this: >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2224430 >>> >>> and now we can use LIBUNWIND_DIR to specific custom dirctories >>> containing libunwind libs. >>> >>> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> for most patches except: >>> >>> v9: >>> - Change function unwind__register_ops() to static. >>> - Move up unwind__prepare_access() in thread__insert_map() and save >>> map_groups__remove() call. >>> - Enclose multiple line if/else into braces. >>> - Fix miss modified function declaration for unwind__prepare_access() >>> in patch 10. >> for patchset: >> >> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > Ok, I'm applying it, after fixing 'perf test unwind', 'perf top --call-graph dwarf' > and 'perf trace --call-graph dwarf', but I have one question, is the > scenario where we collect on a x86_64 machine and want to do analysis on > a ARM64 or x86-32 machine supported? This should be the odd case now, Yes, it's supported. But I never tested this before, so I just compiled libunwind for aarch64, and tested unwinding i686 perf.data on aarch64. Then I found another issue I've considered but missed at some version of this patch series. In util/unwind-libunwind-local.c, PERF_REG_SP/IP is used, but those macros are assigned to the host platform, we should redefine them in the wrapper file, for example in "util/libunwind/x86_32.c". After fixing this problem, i686 perf.data can be parsed on aarch64 machine. Since you've already applied the v9 patches, should I send patches based on the lastest tree as bug fixes or just update v9 patches? Thank you. Here is the modified part: diff --git a/tools/perf/util/libunwind/arm64.c b/tools/perf/util/libunwind/arm64.c index 4fb5395..8a5c2fc 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/libunwind/arm64.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/libunwind/arm64.c @@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ #ifdef NO_LIBUNWIND_DEBUG_FRAME_AARCH64 #define NO_LIBUNWIND_DEBUG_FRAME #endif + +#undef PERF_REG_IP +#undef PERF_REG_SP +#define PERF_REG_IP PERF_REG_ARM64_PC +#define PERF_REG_SP PERF_REG_ARM64_SP #include "util/unwind-libunwind-local.c" struct unwind_libunwind_ops * diff --git a/tools/perf/util/libunwind/x86_32.c b/tools/perf/util/libunwind/x86_32.c index d98c17e..de21a39 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/libunwind/x86_32.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/libunwind/x86_32.c @@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ #ifndef NO_LIBUNWIND_DEBUG_FRAME #define NO_LIBUNWIND_DEBUG_FRAME #endif + +#undef PERF_REG_IP +#undef PERF_REG_SP +#define PERF_REG_IP PERF_REG_X86_IP +#define PERF_REG_SP PERF_REG_X86_SP #include "util/unwind-libunwind-local.c" struct unwind_libunwind_ops * > but from a quick look I couldn't see this as being supported, is that > true or I was just lazy not to have tried this? > > - Arnaldo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-06-03 05:40 +0200
[PATCH v9 14/14] perf callchain: Support aarch64 cross-platform He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-06-03 05:40 +0200
[tip:perf/core] perf callchain: Support aarch64 cross-platform tip-bot for He Kuang <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-06-08 11:00 +0200
[PATCH v9 06/14] perf tools: Separate local/remote libunwind config He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-06-03 05:40 +0200
[tip:perf/core] perf unwind: Separate local/remote libunwind config tip-bot for He Kuang <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-06-08 10:50 +0200
[PATCH v9 11/14] perf tools: Change fixed name of libunwind__arch_reg_id to macro He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-06-03 05:40 +0200
[tip:perf/core] perf unwind: Change fixed name of libunwind__arch_reg_id to macro tip-bot for He Kuang <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-06-08 11:00 +0200
[PATCH v9 09/14] perf tools: Export normalize_arch() function He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-06-03 05:40 +0200
[tip:perf/core] perf tools: Export normalize_arch() function tip-bot for He Kuang <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-06-08 11:00 +0200
[PATCH v9 02/14] perf tools: Decouple thread->address_space on libunwind He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-06-03 05:40 +0200
[tip:perf/core] perf unwind: Decouple thread->address_space on libunwind tip-bot for He Kuang <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-06-08 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-06-03 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind Hekuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-06-04 07:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-07 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-07 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-03 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-07 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind Hekuang <hekuang@huawei.com> - 2016-06-08 09:40 +0200
csiph-web