Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1414735
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI |
| Date | 2016-06-06 10:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rGXVo-2jv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rFdBf-8pl-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFdBf-8pl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFhvf-2p3-117@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFiKC-3t1-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <rGwVb-1sD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 05/06/2016 05:28, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> > No, I don't think so, the existing req_immediate_exit case is only after >> > a VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME vmexit, in which case we already have a >> > >> > if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending) >> > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu); >> > >> > in vmx_vcpu_run. > Do you think this can be removed since it blindly request a > KVM_REQ_EVENT even if there is no still-pending event to L1 which > blocked by nested_run_pending, however, req_immediate_exit can > indicate there is a pending event blocked by nested_run_pending and > the request KVM_REQUEST_EVENT added in your patch can guarantee inject > this pending event in the next nested vmexit. Yes, I think so. Thanks, Paolo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-01 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-06-01 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-01 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-05 05:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-06 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: avoid simultaneous queueing of both IRQ and SMI Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 10:30 +0200
csiph-web