Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1411062
| From | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] scpi: Add SCPI framework to handle vendors variants |
| Date | 2016-06-01 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rFbpM-788-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rCZVM-4Fq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <rD6kx-dV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rDl9U-XC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <rEqTU-1KK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | ARM |
On 30/05/16 09:30, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 05/27/2016 10:17 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote: [..] > > While looking for other ARMv8 based platform, I found that the RK3368 > platform has the same SCPI implementation as Amlogic. > > They extended it with DDR, system and thermal commands. > > Look at : > https://github.com/geekboxzone/mmallow_kernel/blob/geekbox/drivers/mailbox/scpi_cmd.h > >https://github.com/geekboxzone/mmallow_kernel/blob/geekbox/drivers/mailbox/scpi_protocol.c > > So the SCPI must have a framework to allow different protocol > versions, and must allow command extension. Grouping Rockchip and > Amlogic should be done, thus needing a generic name like vendor_scpi > or with a version. > Makes sense. I understand the need to reuse and I need a bit of time to have a look at the code(both Amlogic one's you have pointed out and the Rockchip one) in detail to see what's the best way to proceed. I will have a look at this later this week and get back to you. > Sudeep, could you somehow find out which version of the protocol > AmLogic and Rockchip based their SCPI development ? > Yes I tried checking with Rockchip but didn't get a response. But my guess is that it was some preliminary unpublished version of SCPI unfortunately :( -- Regards, Sudeep
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] scpi: Add SCPI framework to handle vendors variants Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-01 12:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] scpi: Add SCPI framework to handle vendors variants Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-06-01 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] scpi: Add SCPI framework to handle vendors variants Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-06-01 18:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] scpi: Add SCPI framework to handle vendors variants Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-06-01 20:50 +0200
csiph-web