Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1412381
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted |
| Date | 2016-06-02 18:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rFDcm-7Kh-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rFBDz-6Xf-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rFCpY-7tY-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2 June 2016 at 20:38, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> This series fixes all cpufreq drivers that provide a 'target_index' >> callback or in other words, which provide a freq-table to cpufreq core, >> to make sure they *only* use the 'index' argument to ->target_index() >> with the policy->freq_table. >> >> This change allows us to remove the (duplicate) sorted-freq-table, which >> was added by following series: >> >> [PATCH V2 0/2] cpufreq: Use sorted frequency tables > > Which I'm not going to apply. > > If this series depended on that one, please rework it. Hi Rafael, The first 9 patches can be applied without any dependency on the earlier series, but not the last two. The target of this series is to make freq-table lookup faster and so most of its patches would make sense only if we are trying to solve that problem. Otherwise they may not be required at all. I hope that you will be replying to the earlier series [1] as well, to convey the concerns you have with it. Thanks -- viresh [1] [PATCH V2 0/2] cpufreq: Use sorted frequency tables
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 16:20 +0200
[PATCH 04/11] cpufreq: blackfin: Use 'index' only to index into policy->freq_table Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 16:20 +0200
[PATCH 01/11] ARM: davinci: Sort frequency table Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 16:30 +0200
[PATCH 05/11] cpufreq: elanfreq: Use 'index' only to index into policy->freq_table Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 16:30 +0200
[PATCH 10/11] cpufreq: Keep a single (sorted) freq_table Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 16:30 +0200
[PATCH 02/11] cpufreq: davinci: Reuse cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 16:30 +0200
[PATCH 11/11] cpufreq: drivers: Free frequency tables after being used Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 16:30 +0200
[PATCH 08/11] cpufreq: imx: Use 'index' only to index into policy->freq_table Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 16:30 +0200
[PATCH 03/11] cpufreq: Use policy->freq_table in ->target_index() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 16:30 +0200
[PATCH 09/11] cpufreq: maple: Use 'index' only to index into policy->freq_table Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-06-02 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-02 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-06-02 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-03 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-06-03 03:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 00/11] cpufreq: Keep policy->freq_table sorted Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2016-06-03 05:20 +0200
csiph-web