Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1403014
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE() |
| Date | 2016-05-18 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rAakG-39y-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rzYtc-3J2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rzYtc-3J2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Waiman Long wrote: >Without using WRITE_ONCE(), the compiler can potentially break a >write into multiple smaller ones (store tearing). So a read from the >same data by another task concurrently may return a partial result. >This can result in a kernel crash if the data is a memory address >that is being dereferenced. > >This patch changes all write to rwsem->owner to use WRITE_ONCE() >to make sure that store tearing will not happen. READ_ONCE() may >not be needed for rwsem->owner as long as the value is only used for >comparison and not dereferencing. > >Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com> Yes, ->owner can obviously be handled locklessly during optimistic spinning. Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE() Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com> - 2016-05-18 03:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-05-18 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE() Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-18 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-18 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-18 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-20 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> - 2016-05-21 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-05-22 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com> - 2016-05-23 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-05-23 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-05-23 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-05-23 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] locking/rwsem: Protect all writes to owner by WRITE_ONCE Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2016-05-25 03:30 +0200
csiph-web