Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1402871
| From | Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure |
| Date | 2016-05-18 12:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rA6TN-Pd-53@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ry8wG-81C-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ry8Gm-868-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <rA5uF-8b8-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> I've done some basic sanity testing on powerpc with the cyclomatic > complexity plugin (with LE native + cross-compilers) and it seems to > work with the patch below. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > index a18a0dc..0cfed5b 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ config PPC > select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS if MPROFILE_KERNEL > select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER > select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER > + select HAVE_GCC_PLUGINS > select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE > select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB > select VIRT_TO_BUS if !PPC64 Hi, Did you test the plugins with all gcc versions (4.5-6)? -- Emese
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce GCC plugin infrastructure Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 01:50 +0200
[PATCH v8 4/4] Add sancov plugin Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 02:00 +0200
[PATCH v8 3/4] Add Cyclomatic complexity GCC plugin Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 02:00 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 3/4] Add Cyclomatic complexity GCC plugin Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> - 2016-05-18 10:30 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 3/4] Add Cyclomatic complexity GCC plugin Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com> - 2016-05-17 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 12:50 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> - 2016-05-18 11:00 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 12:30 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> - 2016-05-18 23:20 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-05-19 08:30 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> - 2016-05-19 08:50 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure "PaX Team" <pageexec@freemail.hu> - 2016-05-19 10:50 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> - 2016-05-20 08:30 +0200
Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v8 2/4] GCC plugin infrastructure Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-05-20 12:20 +0200
csiph-web