Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1351350
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree |
| Date | 2016-03-07 08:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r9Y5r-8lu-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r9jvk-68k-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <r9wLU-73U-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r9BVg-2m0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r9Fct-4og-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <r9Xj4-7Of-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:06:46PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Following will not help > depends on THERMAL_OF if THERMAL_OF > because THERMAL_OF is always "y" even if THERMAL is "m". > Build error can by resolved by adding below in the Kconfig > depends on THERMAL > but the issue is if THERMAL is "m" and REGULATOR_MAX8973 is "y" as per the So that should be depends on THERMAL if THERMAL_OF > failure rand config then REGULATOR_MAX8973 automatically become "m". This > may break some existing platform. That's an inevitable consequence of adding this support, you can't get around it. > Also this driver does not need hard dependency in the thermal as max8973 > does not support thermal but max77621 supports it which is again optional. > Some of driver use > drivers/power/charger-manager.c:#ifdef CONFIG_THERMAL > drivers/power/power_supply_core.c:#ifdef CONFIG_THERMAL > So can we give the similar try here and test for build? This is still a hack; if this is causing real problems the thermal subsystem should be doing something to avoid the issue (for example providing an always built in stub) though I suspect in reality it's not a practical issue.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-05 13:30 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-06 03:40 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-06 09:10 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-06 12:40 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-07 08:00 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-07 08:50 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-07 12:10 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 10:20 +0100
csiph-web