Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1351084
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree |
| Date | 2016-03-06 12:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r9Fct-4og-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r9jvk-68k-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <r9wLU-73U-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r9BVg-2m0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:17:37PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Here driver is built in binary and THERMAL is the loadable module.
> Do we really have THERMAL as module i.e. basic framework?
If randconfig can generate it it's valid.
> -#ifdef CONFIG_THERMAL_OF
> +#ifdef CONFIG_THERMAL
> static int max8973_thermal_read_temp(void *data, int *temp)
> {
> struct max8973_chip *mchip = data;
That looks like a hack that might break, I'd not expect it to help here
and probably has some other config that can generate issues. What I
think should be happening here is something like
depends on THERMAL_OF if THERMAL_OF
or similar (ie, there's a direct dependency once the config is enabled).
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-05 13:30 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-06 03:40 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-06 09:10 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-06 12:40 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-07 08:00 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-07 08:50 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-07 12:10 +0100
Re: Applied "regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 10:20 +0100
csiph-web