Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1348582

Re: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: pwm-lpc18xx-sct: test clock rate to avoid division by 0

From Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: pwm-lpc18xx-sct: test clock rate to avoid division by 0
Date 2016-03-02 23:50 +0100
Message-ID <r8nKG-6bw-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r8nAZ-682-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8nB0-682-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Wolfram,

On 2 March 2016 at 23:33, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>
> The clk API may return 0 on clk_get_rate, so we should check the result before
> using it as a divisor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
>
> Should go individually via subsystem tree.
>
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
> index 9163085101bc94..6487962c355c03 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
> @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static int lpc18xx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         }
>
>         lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate = clk_get_rate(lpc18xx_pwm->pwm_clk);
> +       if (!lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate)
> +               return -EINVAL;

This needs to be:
if (!lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate) {
    ret = -EINVAL;
    goto disable_pwmclk;
}

I would also prefer an explicit check against 0 here. ie.:
'lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate == 0'
A dev_err() message would also be nice to have.


regards,
Joachim Eastwood

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 4/6] pwm: pwm-lpc18xx-sct: test clock rate to avoid division by 0 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-03-02 23:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: pwm-lpc18xx-sct: test clock rate to avoid  division by 0 Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 23:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4/6] pwm: pwm-lpc18xx-sct: test clock rate to avoid  division by 0 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-03-03 00:00 +0100

csiph-web