Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1350155

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to UEFI spec

From Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to UEFI spec
Date 2016-03-04 12:10 +0100
Message-ID <r8VMl-5IQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r6eit-3m0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8Ji9-4Qn-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:45:48PM -0700, Linn Crosetto wrote:
> This series modifies the function that queries the status of UEFI Secure Boot
> in the EFI stub to match the UEFI specification, and allow the caller to
> determine if it is enabled, disabled, or in an unknown state due to an
> unexpected error from GetVariable().
> 
> v2:
>  - Add return values for unexpected errors
>  - Split changes into two patches
> 
> v3:
>  - Add more verbosity with additional prints
> 
> Linn Crosetto (2):
>   arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when determining Secure Boot status
>   arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status
> 
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

For the series:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-02-24 01:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot  status Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-02-24 12:30 +0100
  [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100
  [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to UEFI spec Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100
    [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when  determining Secure Boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-03-03 09:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to  UEFI spec Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-03-02 14:40 +0100
    [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-03-03 22:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure  Boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-03-04 09:10 +0100
    [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to UEFI spec Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-03-03 22:50 +0100
      [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-03-03 22:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when  determining Secure Boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-03-04 09:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to  UEFI spec Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-03-04 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to  UEFI spec Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 15:10 +0100

csiph-web