Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1349929

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status

From Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status
Date 2016-03-04 09:10 +0100
Message-ID <r8SY9-3Kf-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r6eit-3m0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8Ji9-4Qn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8Ji9-4Qn-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 3 March 2016 at 22:45, Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> wrote:
> According to the UEFI specification (version 2.5 Errata A, page 87):
>
>     The platform firmware is operating in secure boot mode if the value of
>     the SetupMode variable is 0 and the SecureBoot variable is set to 1. A
>     platform cannot operate in secure boot mode if the SetupMode variable
>     is set to 1.
>
> Check the value of the SetupMode variable when determining the state of
> Secure Boot. Minor cleanup, change sizeof to match kernel style guidelines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com>

Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

> ---
> v2:
>  - Reformat quote from UEFI specification and note cleanup (Mark Rutland)
>  - Restructure code on top of changes in patch 1/2
>
>  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c
> index 1e98fb7..c049d41 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c
> @@ -20,21 +20,39 @@
>
>  static int efi_get_secureboot(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg)
>  {
> -       static efi_guid_t const var_guid = EFI_GLOBAL_VARIABLE_GUID;
> -       static efi_char16_t const var_name[] = {
> +       static efi_char16_t const sb_var_name[] = {
>                 'S', 'e', 'c', 'u', 'r', 'e', 'B', 'o', 'o', 't', 0 };
> +       static efi_char16_t const sm_var_name[] = {
> +               'S', 'e', 't', 'u', 'p', 'M', 'o', 'd', 'e', 0 };
>
> +       efi_guid_t var_guid = EFI_GLOBAL_VARIABLE_GUID;
>         efi_get_variable_t *f_getvar = sys_table_arg->runtime->get_variable;
> -       unsigned long size = sizeof(u8);
> -       efi_status_t status;
>         u8 val;
> +       unsigned long size = sizeof(val);
> +       efi_status_t status;
>
> -       status = f_getvar((efi_char16_t *)var_name, (efi_guid_t *)&var_guid,
> +       status = f_getvar((efi_char16_t *)sb_var_name, (efi_guid_t *)&var_guid,
>                           NULL, &size, &val);
>
> +       if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
> +               goto out_efi_err;
> +
> +       if (val == 0)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       status = f_getvar((efi_char16_t *)sm_var_name, (efi_guid_t *)&var_guid,
> +                         NULL, &size, &val);
> +
> +       if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
> +               goto out_efi_err;
> +
> +       if (val == 1)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       return 1;
> +
> +out_efi_err:
>         switch (status) {
> -       case EFI_SUCCESS:
> -               return val;
>         case EFI_NOT_FOUND:
>                 return 0;
>         case EFI_DEVICE_ERROR:
> --
> 2.1.4
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-02-24 01:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot  status Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-02-24 12:30 +0100
  [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100
  [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to UEFI spec Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100
    [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when  determining Secure Boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-03-03 09:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to  UEFI spec Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-03-02 14:40 +0100
    [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-03-03 22:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64/efi: check SetupMode when determining Secure  Boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-03-04 09:10 +0100
    [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to UEFI spec Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-03-03 22:50 +0100
      [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when determining Secure Boot status Linn Crosetto <linn@hpe.com> - 2016-03-03 22:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64/efi: report unexpected errors when  determining Secure Boot status Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-03-04 09:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to  UEFI spec Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-03-04 12:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64/efi: query Secure Boot status according to  UEFI spec Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2016-03-07 15:10 +0100

csiph-web