Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1349873
| From | Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test |
| Date | 2016-03-04 07:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8RfH-2o1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <r8qfw-84R-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8wbh-3Mh-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8B1h-7eH-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8GDE-2P0-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8NlM-801-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2016/3/4 10:09, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:52:17AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: >> On 03/03/2016 04:49 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> On 2016/3/3 15:42, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >>>> 2016-03-03 10:25 GMT+09:00 Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>: >>>>> (cc -mm and Joonsoo Kim) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 03/02/2016 05:52 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I came across a suspicious error for CMA stress test: >>>>>> >>>>>> Before the test, I got: >>>>>> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma >>>>>> CmaTotal: 204800 kB >>>>>> CmaFree: 195044 kB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> After running the test: >>>>>> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma >>>>>> CmaTotal: 204800 kB >>>>>> CmaFree: 6602584 kB >>>>>> >>>>>> So the freed CMA memory is more than total.. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also the the MemFree is more than mem total: >>>>>> >>>>>> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo >>>>>> MemTotal: 16342016 kB >>>>>> MemFree: 22367268 kB >>>>>> MemAvailable: 22370528 kB >>> [...] >>>>> I played with this a bit and can see the same problem. The sanity >>>>> check of CmaFree < CmaTotal generally triggers in >>>>> __move_zone_freepage_state in unset_migratetype_isolate. >>>>> This also seems to be present as far back as v4.0 which was the >>>>> first version to have the updated accounting from Joonsoo. >>>>> Were there known limitations with the new freepage accounting, >>>>> Joonsoo? >>>> I don't know. I also played with this and looks like there is >>>> accounting problem, however, for my case, number of free page is slightly less >>>> than total. I will take a look. >>>> >>>> Hanjun, could you tell me your malloc_size? I tested with 1 and it doesn't >>>> look like your case. >>> I tested with malloc_size with 2M, and it grows much bigger than 1M, also I >>> did some other test: >>> >>> - run with single thread with 100000 times, everything is fine. >>> >>> - I hack the cam_alloc() and free as below [1] to see if it's lock issue, with >>> the same test with 100 multi-thread, then I got: >>> >>> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma >>> CmaTotal: 204800 kB >>> CmaFree: 225112 kB >>> >>> It only increased about 30M for free, not 6G+ in previous test, although >>> the problem is not solved, the problem is less serious, is it a synchronization >>> problem? >>> >> 'only' 30M is still an issue although I think you are right about something related >> to synchronization. When I put the cma_mutex around free_contig_range I don't see > Hmm... I can see the issue even if putting the cma_mutex around > free_contig_range(). Yes, I can confirm that too, it can reduce the number of erronous freed memory, but the problem is still there. Thanks Hanjun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-02 15:00 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-03-03 02:30 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-03 07:30 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 08:50 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-03 09:00 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-03 14:00 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-03-03 20:00 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-04 03:10 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 07:20 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-04 03:10 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-04 05:40 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 07:10 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-04 07:40 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 08:40 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-07 05:40 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-03-07 09:20 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-03-07 19:50 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-03-08 03:00 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-03-09 02:30 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 16:10 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-11 18:10 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-14 07:50 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-14 08:10 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-14 08:20 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-14 13:40 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 15:20 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-16 13:10 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-16 10:50 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-17 08:00 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-17 10:30 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:40 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-17 16:50 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 17:00 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-03-08 05:10 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-07 14:00 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-08 08:50 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-03-08 11:50 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 16:40 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-03-09 03:20 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 06:40 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-03-08 02:50 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-08 09:10 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 08:10 +0100
Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-07 05:50 +0100
csiph-web