Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test

From	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test
Date	2016-03-04 06:40 +0100
Message-ID	<r8QD0-1Tu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<r8ftO-8on-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8qfw-84R-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8wbh-3Mh-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8B1h-7eH-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8NlM-801-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Joonsoo,

On 2016/3/4 10:02, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:49:01PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2016/3/3 15:42, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> 2016-03-03 10:25 GMT+09:00 Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>:
>>>> (cc -mm and Joonsoo Kim)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/02/2016 05:52 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I came across a suspicious error for CMA stress test:
>>>>>
>>>>> Before the test, I got:
>>>>> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma
>>>>> CmaTotal:         204800 kB
>>>>> CmaFree:          195044 kB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> After running the test:
>>>>> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo | grep Cma
>>>>> CmaTotal:         204800 kB
>>>>> CmaFree:         6602584 kB
>>>>>
>>>>> So the freed CMA memory is more than total..
>>>>>
>>>>> Also the the MemFree is more than mem total:
>>>>>
>>>>> -bash-4.3# cat /proc/meminfo
>>>>> MemTotal:       16342016 kB
>>>>> MemFree:        22367268 kB
>>>>> MemAvailable:   22370528 kB
>> [...]
>>>> I played with this a bit and can see the same problem. The sanity
>>>> check of CmaFree < CmaTotal generally triggers in
>>>> __move_zone_freepage_state in unset_migratetype_isolate.
>>>> This also seems to be present as far back as v4.0 which was the
>>>> first version to have the updated accounting from Joonsoo.
>>>> Were there known limitations with the new freepage accounting,
>>>> Joonsoo?
>>> I don't know. I also played with this and looks like there is
>>> accounting problem, however, for my case, number of free page is slightly less
>>> than total. I will take a look.
>>>
>>> Hanjun, could you tell me your malloc_size? I tested with 1 and it doesn't
>>> look like your case.
>> I tested with malloc_size with 2M, and it grows much bigger than 1M, also I
>> did some other test:
> Thanks! Now, I can re-generate erronous situation you mentioned.
>
>>  - run with single thread with 100000 times, everything is fine.
>>
>>  - I hack the cam_alloc() and free as below [1] to see if it's lock issue, with
>>    the same test with 100 multi-thread, then I got:
> [1] would not be sufficient to close this race.
>
> Try following things [A]. And, for more accurate test, I changed code a bit more
> to prevent kernel page allocation from cma area [B]. This will prevent kernel
> page allocation from cma area completely so we can focus cma_alloc/release race.
>
> Although, this is not correct fix, it could help that we can guess
> where the problem is.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [A]

I tested this solution [A], it can fix the problem, as you are posting a new patch, I will
test that one and leave [B] alone :)

Thanks
Hanjun

Thread

Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-02 15:00 +0100
  Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-03-03 02:30 +0100
    Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-03 07:30 +0100
    Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 08:50 +0100
      Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-03 09:00 +0100
      Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-03 14:00 +0100
        Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-03-03 20:00 +0100
          Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-04 03:10 +0100
            Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 07:20 +0100
        Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-04 03:10 +0100
          Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-04 05:40 +0100
            Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 07:10 +0100
              Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-04 07:40 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 08:40 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-07 05:40 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-03-07 09:20 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2016-03-07 19:50 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-03-08 03:00 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> - 2016-03-09 02:30 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 16:10 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-11 18:10 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-14 07:50 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-14 08:10 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-14 08:20 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-14 13:40 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 15:20 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-16 13:10 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-16 10:50 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-17 08:00 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-17 10:30 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 16:40 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-17 16:50 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 17:00 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2016-03-08 05:10 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2016-03-07 14:00 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-08 08:50 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-03-08 11:50 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 16:40 +0100
                Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-03-09 03:20 +0100
          Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 06:40 +0100
            Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-03-08 02:50 +0100
              Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-08 09:10 +0100
          Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-03-04 08:10 +0100
            Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-03-07 05:50 +0100

csiph-web