Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1349400
| From | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks |
| Date | 2016-03-03 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8EVe-1Ta-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r86qt-2pO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r86qt-2pO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8ka6-3CZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8nUm-6fn-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8oQq-6Vq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:49:53PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > No. This is not about enabling use of "that idiotic discard behavior", for > > that there's BLKDISCARD. This ioctl does NOT use the handwavy old TRIM > > advisory request thing that could return "fuzzy wuzzy" without violating the > > specs. > > So you agree that we could just make BLKZEROOUT always use trim? There is a massive bug in the SATA specs about trim, which is that it is considered advisory. So the storage device can throw it away whenever it feels like it. (In practice, when it's too busy doing other things). The thing is, this fuzzy wuzzy definition of trim in the SATA specs is more and more a SATA-specific bug. The eMMC 5.1 spec has a reliable trim, and SCSI has WRITE SAME. So it's just SATA which has this crazy definition of trim. (In practice there is no real difference between trim and discard; it's just a matter of terminology; in order to determine whether or not trim/discard is reliable you really have to pay close attention to the specs, on in the case of SATA, use a whitelist of drive models, which is crazy.) - Ted
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5.1 0/2] create BLKZEROOUT ioctl that invalidates page cache "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> - 2016-03-02 05:20 +0100
[PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> - 2016-03-02 05:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-03-02 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-03-02 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> - 2016-03-03 00:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-03-03 01:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-03-03 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-03-03 19:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-03-03 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - 2016-03-03 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-03-03 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - 2016-03-03 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-03-03 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> - 2016-03-03 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - 2016-03-03 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-03-03 23:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2016-03-04 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2016-03-04 01:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2016-03-04 00:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Thomas Schoebel-Theuer <tst@schoebel-theuer.de> - 2016-03-04 03:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: create ioctl to discard-or-zeroout a range of blocks Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-03-03 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5.1 0/2] create BLKZEROOUT ioctl that invalidates page cache Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-03-02 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5.1 0/2] create BLKZEROOUT ioctl that invalidates page cache Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-03-02 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5.1 0/2] create BLKZEROOUT ioctl that invalidates page cache Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-03-02 12:00 +0100
csiph-web