Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1349305
| From | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit |
| Date | 2016-03-03 16:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8DFM-IC-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r1Qoq-1Y5-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8C6Z-88W-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8CgG-8cy-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8CA2-8lg-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <r8DcK-oy-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote: > I assume you're referring to gtk-doc? It's web page > (http://www.gtk.org/gtk-doc/) starts by noting that it's "a bit awkward to > setup and use"; they recommend looking at Doxygen instead. So I guess I'm > not really sure what it offers that merits throwing another option into > the mix now? What am I missing? We use gtk-doc for the i915 testcase and tooling repo in userspace (intel-gpu-tools). The setup is somewhat arcane (some build-fu that is fumbly, and xml files to tie everything together). But it looks pretty and works well otherwise. It should be at https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/igt/ but our autobuilder seems to be screwed up right now. Of course I considered it as an option, but like doxygen it has it's own strong opinion about how in-code comments should look like, and those differ from kerneldoc syntax. Beyond that I don't really see benefits over any of the solutions proposed here already (either sphinx or rst or horror! even the hackfest I still carry around in drm-intel.git branches). Btw for igt we went with gtkdoc over docygen because a few people on our team had "doxygen only over my corpse" level kind of strong opinions. Everyone just loves their own color choice for this bikeshed ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> - 2016-03-03 15:10 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-03-03 15:20 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2016-03-03 15:40 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-03-03 16:20 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> - 2016-03-03 16:50 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-03-03 20:00 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> - 2016-03-04 00:30 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-03-04 02:20 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> - 2016-03-04 09:30 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Johannes Stezenbach <js@linuxtv.org> - 2016-03-04 10:00 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Russel Winder <russel@winder.org.uk> - 2016-03-04 08:30 +0100
Re: Kernel docs: muddying the waters a bit Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> - 2016-03-04 08:50 +0100
csiph-web