Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1346795
| From | Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long version number |
| Date | 2016-03-01 18:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r7Whs-3Ha-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r6d34-2h5-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Red Hat |
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 22:58 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The snic version number is expected to be 4 decimals in the form like
> a netmask string with each number stored in an element in array v.
> However, there is an off-by-one check on the number of elements in v
> allowing one to pass a 5 decimal version number causing v[4] to be
> referenced, causing a buffer overrun. Fix the off-by-one error by
> comparing to i > 3 rather than 4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/snic/snic_ctl.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_ctl.c b/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_ctl.c
> index aebe753..ab0e06b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_ctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_ctl.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ snic_ver_enc(const char *s)
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (i > 4 || !isdigit(c))
> + if (i > 3 || !isdigit(c))
> goto end;
>
> v[i] = v[i] * 10 + (c - '0');
int v[4] = {0};
So clearly the i > 4 test is wrong and should be i > 3.
Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long version number Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2016-02-26 00:00 +0100 RE: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long version number "Seymour, Shane M" <shane.seymour@hpe.com> - 2016-03-01 06:40 +0100 Re: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long version number Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com> - 2016-03-01 18:30 +0100 Re: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long version number "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - 2016-03-02 02:20 +0100 Re: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long version number "Narsimhulu Musini (nmusini)" <nmusini@cisco.com> - 2016-03-02 10:10 +0100
csiph-web