Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1346795

Re: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long version number

From Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long version number
Date 2016-03-01 18:30 +0100
Message-ID <r7Whs-3Ha-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r6d34-2h5-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Red Hat

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 22:58 +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> The snic version number is expected to be 4 decimals in the form like
> a netmask string with each number stored in an element in array v.
> However, there is an off-by-one check on the number of elements in v
> allowing one to pass a 5 decimal version number causing v[4] to be
> referenced, causing a buffer overrun.  Fix the off-by-one error by
> comparing to i > 3 rather than 4.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/snic/snic_ctl.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_ctl.c b/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_ctl.c
> index aebe753..ab0e06b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_ctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/snic/snic_ctl.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ snic_ver_enc(const char *s)
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (i > 4 || !isdigit(c))
> +		if (i > 3 || !isdigit(c))
>  			goto end;
>  
>  		v[i] = v[i] * 10 + (c - '0');

        int v[4] = {0};

So clearly the i > 4 test is wrong and should be i > 3.

Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long version number Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2016-02-26 00:00 +0100
  RE: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long  version number "Seymour, Shane M" <shane.seymour@hpe.com> - 2016-03-01 06:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long  version number Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com> - 2016-03-01 18:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long version number "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - 2016-03-02 02:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] snic: correctly check for array overrun on overly long  version number "Narsimhulu Musini (nmusini)" <nmusini@cisco.com> - 2016-03-02 10:10 +0100

csiph-web