Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1339659
| From | Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] of/overlay: of overlay callbacks |
| Date | 2016-02-22 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r50KC-7Jl-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r3pap-EO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3pap-EO-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <r4OT7-7hh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Rob, > On Feb 22, 2016, at 04:55 , Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:41:25AM -0600, Alan Tull wrote: >> Add overlay callback functionality. >> >> When DT overlays are being added, some drivers/subsystems >> will want to know about the changes before they go into the >> live tree. Similarly there is a need for post-remove >> callbacks. >> >> Each handler is registered with a of_device_id. When >> an overlay target matches a handler's id, the handler >> gets called. >> >> The following 4 cases are handled: pre-apply, post-apply, >> pre-remove, and post-remove. > > So I know I suggested maybe not using notifiers, but this ends up just > looking like notifiers, so we might as well use them unless we somehow > change the flow. You would just need to add pre-apply and pre-remove > in of_attach_node and of_detach_node, right? > I agree those look just like notifiers. We could just update the notifier logic to handle this case. Am I missing something else? > Rob Regards — Pantelis
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/1] of/overlay: of overlay callbacks Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-02-22 04:00 +0100 Re: [PATCH 1/1] of/overlay: of overlay callbacks Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-02-22 16:40 +0100
csiph-web