Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1339659

Re: [PATCH 1/1] of/overlay: of overlay callbacks

From Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 1/1] of/overlay: of overlay callbacks
Date 2016-02-22 16:40 +0100
Message-ID <r50KC-7Jl-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r3pap-EO-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3pap-EO-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <r4OT7-7hh-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Rob,

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 04:55 , Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:41:25AM -0600, Alan Tull wrote:
>> Add overlay callback functionality.
>> 
>> When DT overlays are being added, some drivers/subsystems
>> will want to know about the changes before they go into the
>> live tree.  Similarly there is a need for post-remove
>> callbacks.
>> 
>> Each handler is registered with a of_device_id.  When
>> an overlay target matches a handler's id, the handler
>> gets called.
>> 
>> The following 4 cases are handled: pre-apply, post-apply,
>> pre-remove, and post-remove.
> 
> So I know I suggested maybe not using notifiers, but this ends up just 
> looking like notifiers, so we might as well use them unless we somehow 
> change the flow. You would just need to add pre-apply and pre-remove 
> in of_attach_node and of_detach_node, right?
> 


I agree those look just like notifiers. We could just update the notifier
logic to handle this case.

Am I missing something else?


> Rob

Regards

— Pantelis

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 1/1] of/overlay: of overlay callbacks Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-02-22 04:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/1] of/overlay: of overlay callbacks Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> - 2016-02-22 16:40 +0100

csiph-web