Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1337177
| From | Valentin Rothberg <valentin.rothberg@posteo.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: fix irqf_oneshot.cocci warnings |
| Date | 2016-02-18 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r3sL0-3kd-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r3rOW-2FS-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3rYB-2K0-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3srD-2Xh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r3sBj-311-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Krzysztof,
On 2/18/16 9:50 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18.02.2016 17:46, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 2/18/16 9:13 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 18.02.2016 17:06, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
>>>> From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Since commit 1c6c69525b40 ("genirq: Reject bogus threaded irq requests")
>>>> threaded IRQs without a primary handler need to be requested with
>>>> IRQF_ONESHOT, otherwise the request will fail.
>>>>
>>>> So pass the IRQF_ONESHOT flag in this case.
>>>>
>>>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
>>>>
>>>> CC: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <valentin.rothberg@posteo.net>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nack, because:
>>> 1. AFAIR this is a false positive.
>>
>> Looking at kernel/irq/manage.c +1250 such requests will be rejected
>> unconditionally when the primary handler is NULL, except when the chip
>> is marked to be oneshot safe.
>>
>> Is there another semantic that I am not aware of? In case the script
>> produces false positives, I will change it immediately.
>
> The handler is "irq_nested_primary_handler".
>
>>> 2. Was it tested? Was it reproduced? Was the bug actually spotted or
>>> just coccicheck pointed this and you assumed that "request will fail"?
>>>
>>> Coccicheck is a great tool... but not necessarily for pointing run-time
>>> bugs.
>>
>> I did not test it. To me the issue rather seems seems like something
>> where Coccinelle is really good at, static analysis.
>
> Yet, this is somehow subtle (device inter-dependencies) so it falls out
> of static into runtime (I mean runtime analysis is needed).
Thanks for your answer. I wasn't aware of this at all.
Best regards,
Valentin
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] rtc: max77686: fix irqf_oneshot.cocci warnings Valentin Rothberg <valentin.rothberg@posteo.net> - 2016-02-18 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: fix irqf_oneshot.cocci warnings Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-02-18 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: fix irqf_oneshot.cocci warnings Valentin Rothberg <valentin.rothberg@posteo.net> - 2016-02-18 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: fix irqf_oneshot.cocci warnings Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-02-18 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: fix irqf_oneshot.cocci warnings Valentin Rothberg <valentin.rothberg@posteo.net> - 2016-02-18 10:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: fix irqf_oneshot.cocci warnings Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2016-02-18 10:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: fix irqf_oneshot.cocci warnings Valentin Rothberg <valentin.rothberg@posteo.net> - 2016-02-18 10:30 +0100
csiph-web