Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1334695

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: SubmittingPatches: Add note about Reviewed-by tags

From Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] Documentation: SubmittingPatches: Add note about Reviewed-by tags
Date 2016-02-15 19:20 +0100
Message-ID <r2vUD-4Jg-49@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <r1buV-zY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2vrB-4dy-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Jon,

Comments below

On 16-02-15 09:43 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:12:58 -0800
> Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As is now common in a lot of organization having an internal code review
>> process (be it through Gerritt or other tools), patches extracted from
>> this review process and submitted to public mailing-lists will have
>> pre-existing Reviewed-by tags. Add a note about why these tags exists,
>> and what a maintainer could be doing with those. Some maintainers did
>> complain before that these tags had to be added when the patches get
>> submitted to the public, while some just ignored and took the patches
>> as-is.
>
> So I'll confess, I'm not quite sold on this one.  This is a document for
> people looking to learn about how to submit patches; it is already far
> too long, complex, and bureaucratic.

I agree - the patch submission process is too complicated with the email 
review and approval process in place.  If it could be streamlined in any 
way I'm all for it.  But the documentation associated with this process 
is not detailed enough and needs updating whenever possible.  It is too 
vague and leaves things open for interpretation.  This causes different 
Maintainers to have different opinions on the patch submission format 
right now.  When clarification is needed it should be added in the 
documentation.

> I'm not at all convinced that
> adding suggestions for maintainers is appropriate here.
>
> Is there a real problem that this patch is trying to solve?
Yes - the patch submission documentation does not detail what to do with 
<Reviewed-by> fields from internal code reviews of patches.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
>
Regards,
  Scott

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] Documentation: SubmittingPatches: Add note about Reviewed-by tags Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 03:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Documentation: SubmittingPatches: Add note about  Reviewed-by tags Anup Patel <anup.patel@broadcom.com> - 2016-02-12 04:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Documentation: SubmittingPatches: Add note about  Reviewed-by tags Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@broadcom.com> - 2016-02-12 19:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] Documentation: SubmittingPatches: Add note about  Reviewed-by tags Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-02-15 18:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] Documentation: SubmittingPatches: Add note about  Reviewed-by tags Scott Branden <scott.branden@broadcom.com> - 2016-02-15 19:20 +0100

csiph-web