Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1335762
| From | Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier |
| Date | 2016-02-16 21:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r2TWX-3TM-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <r2eqM-1c5-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2AKC-7Tu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2B3Y-800-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2C01-aC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2Juy-5sH-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
+++ Miroslav Benes [16/02/16 09:41 +0100]:
>On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
>
>> +++ Jiri Kosina [16/02/16 00:42 +0100]:
>> > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> >
>> > > So I think the commit causing the regression is 5156dca34a3e, which
>> > > occurred in the 4.5 cycle, *not* in 4.4.
>> >
>> > Agreed, by "4.4 regresion" I mean "regression compared to 4.4"; i.e.
>> > regression that will become real issue once 4.5 is released.
>> >
>> > > Also it's my understanding that only the third patch ("remove ftrace
>> > > module notifier") is needed to fix the regression, and the other patches
>> > > are just general improvements. So if needed I think we can just rebase
>> > > that patch (which already has Rusty's ack I believe) and send it to
>> > > Linus now.
>> >
>> > 3/4 and 4/4 are be sufficient, yes (although I'd like to have this
>> > confimed by Jessica, as she apparently already has a reliable testcase).
>>
>> Yes, so Josh is right; technically only patch 3/4 "ftrace/module:
>> remove ftrace module notifier" is sufficient enough to fix the bug,
>> and patch 4/4 is just a natural extension of that change. Since I'm
>> going to be sending out another patchset anyway without the module.c
>> cleanups, I'll just keep them together.
>
>Yes, 3/4 should be sufficient to fix the bug. However if you take 4/4 too,
>you need 1/4 as well. Otherwise we would introduce a bug in error handling
>as Petr pointed out.
>
Hm. I am just realizing that patch 4/4 will still need new ACK's for
the error handling portion. What I'll do is, after testing, send out
patch 3/4 ("ftrace/module: remove ftrace module notifier") as a
standalone patch to be merged immediately, since it fixes an actual
bug. The rest of this patchset will follow separately and can be
reviewed at its own pace.
Jessica
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2016-02-10 01:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-02-10 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-02-15 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-02-16 00:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-02-16 00:50 +0100
Re: livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-02-16 01:50 +0100
Re: livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-02-16 09:50 +0100
Re: livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-02-16 21:00 +0100
csiph-web