Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1334887
| From | Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier |
| Date | 2016-02-16 01:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r2C01-aC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <r0qPo-357-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0Ac3-VA-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2eqM-1c5-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2AKC-7Tu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <r2B3Y-800-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
+++ Jiri Kosina [16/02/16 00:42 +0100]:
>On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
>> So I think the commit causing the regression is 5156dca34a3e, which
>> occurred in the 4.5 cycle, *not* in 4.4.
>
>Agreed, by "4.4 regresion" I mean "regression compared to 4.4"; i.e.
>regression that will become real issue once 4.5 is released.
>
>> Also it's my understanding that only the third patch ("remove ftrace
>> module notifier") is needed to fix the regression, and the other patches
>> are just general improvements. So if needed I think we can just rebase
>> that patch (which already has Rusty's ack I believe) and send it to
>> Linus now.
>
>3/4 and 4/4 are be sufficient, yes (although I'd like to have this
>confimed by Jessica, as she apparently already has a reliable testcase).
Yes, so Josh is right; technically only patch 3/4 "ftrace/module:
remove ftrace module notifier" is sufficient enough to fix the bug,
and patch 4/4 is just a natural extension of that change. Since I'm
going to be sending out another patchset anyway without the module.c
cleanups, I'll just keep them together.
Jessica
>To be honest: I was skiing (and being offline) thursday - sunday :), so my
>original plan was to get Ack from Rusty in the meantime, and then send
>pull request to Linus once I am back on sunday evening.
>
>This is not going to happen, so we have to start with plan B (which is
>pushing just 3/4 and 4/4). Jessica, could you please send me updated (and
>tested on your side) patchset with module.c cleanups omitted?
>
>Steven, I'd appreciate if you could tell me whether your Ack to
>"ftrace/module: remove ftrace module notifier" still holds even if
>module.c changes are not happening.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--
>Jiri Kosina
>SUSE Labs
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2016-02-10 01:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-02-10 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-02-15 00:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-02-16 00:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-02-16 00:50 +0100
Re: livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-02-16 01:50 +0100
Re: livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> - 2016-02-16 09:50 +0100
Re: livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2016-02-16 21:00 +0100
csiph-web