Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1330849

Re: [PATCH v2] iio: Add IIO support for the DAC on the Apex Embedded Systems STX104

From William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2] iio: Add IIO support for the DAC on the Apex Embedded Systems STX104
Date 2016-02-10 03:30 +0100
Message-ID <r0sHw-4lc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qZYgt-75-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <r0p6W-1XI-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:37:09PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>My only real question is on the naming of the module parameter.
>Is it the equivalent of the io address that a load of ISA
>radio drivers seem to use?  (fed to me by grepping isa_register_driver)
>If so perhaps that's the 'standard' name as much as one exists for this?

Yes, you noted correctly that the stx104_base module parameter fulfills
the same function as the io module parameter used in many of the radio
drivers: it's an array holding the io port address of each device.
However, I find "io" to be a rather vague module parameter name, so I've
decided to use the more apt "stx104_base" name for my array of base
addresses.

As you've probably noticed, there are few ISA drivers existing in the
kernel baseline currently, so not much of a standard is set yet. I'm all
right with renaming the module parameter if you have a preference, just
as long as the name is more informative than simply "io."

For what it's worth, this driver is part of a series of PC/104 drivers
I've been submitting to various subsystems (in the hopes of improving
the lack of PC/104 support in the baseline Linux kernel); see
drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c and drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idi-48.c for
example. I have thus far been following the convention of naming the
base address module parameter as "modname_base," where "modname" is the
respective module name.

William Breathitt Gray

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2] iio: Add IIO support for the DAC on the Apex Embedded  Systems STX104 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2016-02-09 23:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2] iio: Add IIO support for the DAC on the Apex Embedded  Systems STX104 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 03:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] iio: Add IIO support for the DAC on the Apex Embedded  Systems STX104 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2016-02-10 20:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2] iio: Add IIO support for the DAC on the Apex Embedded  Systems STX104 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 22:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v2] iio: Add IIO support for the DAC on the Apex Embedded Systems STX104 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> - 2016-02-10 23:50 +0100

csiph-web