Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform

From	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform
Date	2016-02-09 04:20 +0100
Message-ID	<r070l-6ty-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qTHLk-3dT-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qZQiS-3i5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qZTTs-5KP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <r02tI-33a-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:21:57PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 18:44:19 schrieb Vinod Koul:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 08:41:34 schrieb Vinod Koul:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:56:54PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> > > > > Hello Vinod,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is there any chance apply the DMA patches?:-)
> > > > 
> > > > I was waiting for any ACKs on ARM patches before I merge this series.
> > > 
> > > I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the
> > > driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the
> > > specific arm- tree. But if you really want to take the whole series,
> > > for patches 4,5,6
> > Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't
> > be a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go
> > thru ARM tree.
> > 
> > Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not
> > provided..
> > 
> > So, are all okay to merge the entire series thru dmaengine tree or
> > independent. I don't mind either
> 
> In general I don't mind either solution, but would prefer me taking the 3 
> "ARM: dts: foo" patches, while the rest would go through your tree.
> 
> Main reason is to prevent any possible conflicts with other Rockchip 
> devicetree additions also going into 4.6 .

Sounds good, will queue them up

-- 
~Vinod

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 08:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-02-08 04:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-02-08 10:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-02-08 14:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-02-08 15:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-02-08 23:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-02-09 04:20 +0100

csiph-web