Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1329643
| From | Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform |
| Date | 2016-02-08 23:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r02tI-33a-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qTHLk-3dT-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qZQiS-3i5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qZTTs-5KP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Vinod, Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 18:44:19 schrieb Vinod Koul: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 08:41:34 schrieb Vinod Koul: > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:56:54PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote: > > > > Hello Vinod, > > > > > > > > Is there any chance apply the DMA patches?:-) > > > > > > I was waiting for any ACKs on ARM patches before I merge this series. > > > > I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the > > driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the > > specific arm- tree. But if you really want to take the whole series, > > for patches 4,5,6 > Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't > be a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go > thru ARM tree. > > Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not > provided.. > > So, are all okay to merge the entire series thru dmaengine tree or > independent. I don't mind either In general I don't mind either solution, but would prefer me taking the 3 "ARM: dts: foo" patches, while the rest would go through your tree. Main reason is to prevent any possible conflicts with other Rockchip devicetree additions also going into 4.6 . Thanks Heiko > > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3288 platform > > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3xxx platform > > - ARM: dts: add pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3036 SoCs > > > > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> > > Thanks
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 08:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-02-08 04:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-02-08 10:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-02-08 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-02-08 15:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-02-08 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> - 2016-02-09 04:20 +0100
csiph-web