Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1275713
| From | Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 |
| Date | 2015-11-23 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qy4bT-5B2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qxgf7-5LH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxKPU-150-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxL9f-1sn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxL9g-1sn-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qy1xn-3M1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 23/11/15 15:42, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> wrote:
>> + priv->clk = of_clk_get(dev->of_node, 0);
>
>
> Why not use a named clock here? That way you can make use of
> devm_clk_get and don't need to care about putting it.
Ok.
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver bcm63268_nand_driver = {
>> + .probe = bcm63268_nand_probe,
>> + .remove = brcmnand_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "bcm63268_nand",
>> + .pm = &brcmnand_pm_ops,
>> + .of_match_table = bcm63268_nand_of_match,
>> + }
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(bcm63268_nand_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Simon Arlott");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NAND driver for BCM63268");
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>> index 2c8f67f..7b4988f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>> @@ -2270,6 +2270,9 @@ int brcmnand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> list_for_each_entry(host, &ctrl->host_list, node)
>> nand_release(&host->mtd);
>>
>> + if (ctrl->soc && ctrl->soc->remove_device)
>> + ctrl->soc->remove_device(ctrl->soc);
>> +
>
> This is a bit weird, why don't you just use your own .remove callback
> for the driver that like you did for .probe? then you won't need to
> add a remove_device callback at all.
I don't have access to the struct brcmnand_soc which is stored by
brcmnand_probe() as the containing struct is defined in brcmnand.c.
I could move that struct out to a header file and use it directly from a
bcm63268_nand_remove() function but I'd have to move a few other defines
too.
>> dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>>
>> return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.h b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
>> index ef5eabb..5c5dc2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct brcmnand_soc {
>> bool (*ctlrdy_ack)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc);
>> void (*ctlrdy_set_enabled)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool en);
>> void (*prepare_data_bus)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool prepare);
>> + void (*remove_device)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc);
>> };
>>
>> static inline void brcmnand_soc_data_bus_prepare(struct brcmnand_soc *soc)
>
>
> Jonas
>
--
Simon Arlott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,nand-bcm63268 device tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-21 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,nand-bcm63268 device tree binding Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2015-11-22 23:00 +0100
[PATCH (v4) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-22 23:20 +0100
[PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-22 23:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org> - 2015-11-23 16:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-23 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 19:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-24 09:20 +0100
[PATCH (v5) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-24 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 19:50 +0100
[PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device tree binding "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-24 21:20 +0100
[PATCH (v6) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-24 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH (v6) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org> - 2015-11-25 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH (v6) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-25 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH (v6) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org> - 2015-11-25 14:00 +0100
[PATCH (v7) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-25 20:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device tree binding Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2015-11-25 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH (v4) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device tree binding Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2015-11-22 23:30 +0100
csiph-web