Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1275713

Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268

From Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268
Date 2015-11-23 19:40 +0100
Message-ID <qy4bT-5B2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qxgf7-5LH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxKPU-150-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxL9f-1sn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qxL9g-1sn-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qy1xn-3M1-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 23/11/15 15:42, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> wrote:
>> +       priv->clk = of_clk_get(dev->of_node, 0);
> 
> 
> Why not use a named clock here? That way you can make use of
> devm_clk_get and don't need to care about putting it.

Ok.

>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver bcm63268_nand_driver = {
>> +       .probe                  = bcm63268_nand_probe,
>> +       .remove                 = brcmnand_remove,
>> +       .driver = {
>> +               .name           = "bcm63268_nand",
>> +               .pm             = &brcmnand_pm_ops,
>> +               .of_match_table = bcm63268_nand_of_match,
>> +       }
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(bcm63268_nand_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Simon Arlott");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NAND driver for BCM63268");
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>> index 2c8f67f..7b4988f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
>> @@ -2270,6 +2270,9 @@ int brcmnand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         list_for_each_entry(host, &ctrl->host_list, node)
>>                 nand_release(&host->mtd);
>>
>> +       if (ctrl->soc && ctrl->soc->remove_device)
>> +               ctrl->soc->remove_device(ctrl->soc);
>> +
> 
> This is a bit weird, why don't you just use your own .remove callback
> for the driver that like you did for .probe? then you won't need to
> add a remove_device callback at all.

I don't have access to the struct brcmnand_soc which is stored by
brcmnand_probe() as the containing struct is defined in brcmnand.c.

I could move that struct out to a header file and use it directly from a
bcm63268_nand_remove() function but I'd have to move a few other defines
too.

>>         dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>>
>>         return 0;
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.h b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
>> index ef5eabb..5c5dc2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.h
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct brcmnand_soc {
>>         bool (*ctlrdy_ack)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc);
>>         void (*ctlrdy_set_enabled)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool en);
>>         void (*prepare_data_bus)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc, bool prepare);
>> +       void (*remove_device)(struct brcmnand_soc *soc);
>>  };
>>
>>  static inline void brcmnand_soc_data_bus_prepare(struct brcmnand_soc *soc)
> 
> 
> Jonas
> 


-- 
Simon Arlott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,nand-bcm63268 device tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-21 14:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,nand-bcm63268 device tree  binding Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2015-11-22 23:00 +0100
    [PATCH (v4) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device tree  binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-22 23:20 +0100
      [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-22 23:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org> - 2015-11-23 16:50 +0100
          Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-23 19:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 19:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-24 09:20 +0100
            [PATCH (v5) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-24 19:20 +0100
            Re: [PATCH (v4) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 19:50 +0100
              [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device tree  binding "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-24 21:20 +0100
                [PATCH (v6) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-24 21:30 +0100
                Re: [PATCH (v6) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org> - 2015-11-25 11:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH (v6) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 "Simon Arlott" <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-25 13:40 +0100
                Re: [PATCH (v6) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org> - 2015-11-25 14:00 +0100
                [PATCH (v7) 2/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add support for the BCM63268 Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-11-25 20:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2015-11-25 21:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH (v4) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2015-11-22 23:30 +0100

csiph-web