Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1272388
| From | "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 4/5] arm64: Make fail_incapable_cpu reusable |
| Date | 2015-11-18 18:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qwep4-5SC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qwep4-5SC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwep4-5SC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Refactors the code to get rid of the depenency on the capability
for fail_incapable_cpu(), so that it can be used by other checks.
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 24 +++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 0669c63..5629f2c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -826,15 +826,15 @@ static u64 __raw_read_system_reg(u32 sys_id)
}
/*
- * Park the CPU which doesn't have the capability as advertised
- * by the system.
+ * Park the calling CPU which doesn't have the capability
+ * as advertised by the system.
*/
-static void fail_incapable_cpu(char *cap_type,
- const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap)
+static void fail_incapable_cpu(void)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- pr_crit("CPU%d: missing %s : %s\n", cpu, cap_type, cap->desc);
+ pr_crit("CPU%d: will not boot\n", cpu);
+
/* Mark this CPU absent */
set_cpu_present(cpu, 0);
@@ -875,8 +875,11 @@ void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
* If the new CPU misses an advertised feature, we cannot proceed
* further, park the cpu.
*/
- if (!feature_matches(__raw_read_system_reg(caps[i].sys_reg), &caps[i]))
- fail_incapable_cpu("arm64_features", &caps[i]);
+ if (!feature_matches(__raw_read_system_reg(caps[i].sys_reg), &caps[i])) {
+ pr_crit("CPU%d: missing feature: %s\n",
+ smp_processor_id(), caps[i].desc);
+ fail_incapable_cpu();
+ }
if (caps[i].enable)
caps[i].enable(NULL);
}
@@ -884,8 +887,11 @@ void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
for (i = 0, caps = arm64_hwcaps; caps[i].desc; i++) {
if (!cpus_have_hwcap(&caps[i]))
continue;
- if (!feature_matches(__raw_read_system_reg(caps[i].sys_reg), &caps[i]))
- fail_incapable_cpu("arm64_hwcaps", &caps[i]);
+ if (!feature_matches(__raw_read_system_reg(caps[i].sys_reg), &caps[i])) {
+ pr_crit("CPU%d: missing HWCAP: %s\n",
+ smp_processor_id(), caps[i].desc);
+ fail_incapable_cpu();
+ }
}
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/5] arm64: cpufeature: Fixes for 4.4-rc1 "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - 2015-11-18 18:10 +0100
[PATCH 1/5] arm64: cpufeature: Add helpers for extracting unsigned values "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - 2015-11-18 18:10 +0100
[PATCH 4/5] arm64: Make fail_incapable_cpu reusable "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - 2015-11-18 18:10 +0100
[PATCH 2/5] arm64: cpufeature: Track unsigned fields "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - 2015-11-18 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: cpufeature: Track unsigned fields AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-11-19 06:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: cpufeature: Track unsigned fields "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2015-11-19 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: cpufeature: Track unsigned fields "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2015-11-19 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: cpufeature: Track unsigned fields Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-11-19 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm64: cpufeature: Track unsigned fields "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2015-11-20 14:40 +0100
[PATCH 5/5] arm64: Ensure the secondary CPUs have safe ASIDBits size "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - 2015-11-18 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Ensure the secondary CPUs have safe ASIDBits size Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-23 18:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: Ensure the secondary CPUs have safe ASIDBits size "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2015-11-24 00:50 +0100
[PATCH 3/5] arm64: debug: Treat the BRPs/WRPs as unsigned "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> - 2015-11-18 18:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: debug: Treat the BRPs/WRPs as unsigned Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-11-23 18:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: cpufeature: Fixes for 4.4-rc1 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2015-11-26 19:20 +0100
csiph-web