Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1274327
| From | Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: make bus recovery through pinctrl optional |
| Date | 2015-11-20 19:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qwYid-2hb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qw5lL-8cX-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qw5lL-8cX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwjRL-YV-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qwss3-6IF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: > Hello, > > Cc += Linus Walleij, linux-gpio > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:59:11PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Uwe Kleine-König >> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:02:59PM -0600, Li Yang wrote: >> >> @@ -1125,7 +1119,12 @@ static int i2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> >> goto clk_disable; >> >> } >> >> >> >> - i2c_imx_init_recovery_info(i2c_imx, pdev); >> >> + /* optional bus recovery feature through pinctrl */ >> >> + i2c_imx->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(&pdev->dev); >> >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(i2c_imx->pinctrl)) >> >> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "can't get pinctrl, bus recovery feature disabled\n"); >> >> + else >> >> + i2c_imx_init_recovery_info(i2c_imx, pdev); >> > >> > I'm pretty sure this is wrong. If pinctrl isn't available >> > devm_pinctrl_get returns NULL? But AFAIK you must not ignore an error, >> > so the better thing to do is: >> >> If CONFIG_PINCTRL is not enabled, the devm_pinctrl_get() will return >> NULL directly as defined in the include/linux/pinctrl/consumer.h. >> >> If CONFIG_PINCTRL is enabled because we are using a multi-platform >> image but the actual hardware used doesn't have a pinctrl driver or >> pinctrl device tree nodes. It is expected that the devm_pinctrl_get() >> will return error. But as the pinctrl is only used for bus recovery >> which is just an optional function of this driver. We shouldn't >> bailout the probe but keep the driver working without the bus recovery >> function. As for generic errors like (!dev) or out-of-memory, the >> probe will fail elsewhere anyway. > > IMHO you shouldn't ignore -ENOMEM from devm_pinctrl_get but just the > case for "there was no pinctrl specified in dt". Also consider the i2c > driver is loaded before the pinctrl driver and devm_pinctrl_get returns > -EPROBE_DEFER (I assume it does, didn't check), this should be handled. Make sense. -EPROBE_DEFER should be honored. Maybe it's good to check the -ENOMEM too. I will send a new version. Thanks, Leo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: make bus recovery through pinctrl optional Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> - 2015-11-18 08:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: make bus recovery through pinctrl optional Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com> - 2015-11-19 00:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: make bus recovery through pinctrl optional Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> - 2015-11-19 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] i2c: imx: make bus recovery through pinctrl optional Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com> - 2015-11-20 19:10 +0100
csiph-web