Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports.

From	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports.
Date	2015-11-16 19:00 +0100
Message-ID	<qvwem-1Xe-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <qvv8C-1ij-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvvLk-1Mp-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvvV0-1Q8-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvw4G-1TN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvw4G-1TN-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:48:32PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 16 November 2015 at 17:43, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:32:05PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux
> >> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >> > Please sensibly wrap your messages.  Your lines are longer than 80
> >> > characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply
> >> > to your very very very very very very very very very very very very
> >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very
> >> > very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting
> >> > them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that
> >> > kind of additional work?  Thanks.
> >>
> >> His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters.
> >> You should probably look into fixing your MUA.
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Standard net etiquette is that email should be wrapped around 72
> > characters to give space for reply indentation to remain readable
> > on an 80 column screen. Most of my email replies are written on an
> > 80 column screen.
> 
> Oh, I just thought there was
> a greater reason for your
> 660-character tantrum

Sorry, I've stopped reading at this point, at the point where you start
slinging crap around.  If you have a serious point to make, maybe you
could grow up in the next five minutes and write a proper email, thanks.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

[PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports. Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> - 2015-11-16 15:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly  handle ports and remote ports. Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 17:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly  handle ports and remote ports. Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> - 2015-11-16 17:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly  handle ports and remote ports. Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 18:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly  handle ports and remote ports. Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> - 2015-11-16 18:40 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly  handle ports and remote ports. Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 18:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly  handle ports and remote ports. Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org> - 2015-11-16 18:50 +0100
              Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly  handle ports and remote ports. Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 19:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly  handle ports and remote ports. Liviu Dudau <liviu@dudau.co.uk> - 2015-11-16 22:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly  handle ports and remote ports. Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 23:40 +0100

csiph-web