Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1269978
| From | Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips |
| Date | 2015-11-16 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qvpmx-69b-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <qu9tx-71V-59@gated-at.bofh.it> <quiwN-4sk-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qusPv-2xY-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvoAa-5D7-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qvoAb-5D7-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 16/11/15 09:49, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote: >> On 13/11/15 20:01, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Jon Hunter wrote: >>>> On 12/11/15 23:20, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>>>> If all the RPM devices in the domain go idle, it will be powered off >>>>> independently of the status of the irqchip because the irqchip isn't >>>>> using RPM. >>>> >>>> That's dependent on how the irqchip uses these helpers. If these helpers >>>> invoke RPM then that will not be the case. >>> >>> You need a very proper description of how that domain is working. If >>> all devices are idle, it's not necessary correct to power down the >>> irqchip as is might serve other devices as well. >> >> Agreed. The irqchip should only be powered down if there are no >> interrupts in-use/requested. Runtime-pm will keep a reference count for >> all requested IRQs. > > That means the irqchip won't be powered down automatically when the > last user is powered down, unless all users release their irqs during > suspend. Right. > Handling it automatically needs more bookkeeping than a simple reference > count. So what would you suggest? Adding a pm_runtime_register_irq() API that would register an IRQ with the device that you want RPM to handle? Not sure if there is a better/easier way to handle this. Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/2] Add support for Tegra210 AGIC Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-10 15:40 +0100
[RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-10 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-10 16:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-10 17:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2015-11-10 17:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-11-10 19:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-11 11:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2015-11-11 16:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-12 12:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-11-12 14:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-12 14:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-11-12 14:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-12 15:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-11-12 15:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-12 16:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2015-11-12 14:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2015-11-12 14:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2015-11-13 19:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> - 2015-11-12 18:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> - 2015-11-13 00:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-13 10:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-13 21:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-16 10:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-11-16 10:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-16 11:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-11-16 11:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] genirq: Add runtime resume/suspend support for IRQ chips Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-11-17 13:00 +0100
csiph-web